Ivan Katchanovski - a falsifier of the contemporary history of Ukraine

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine:
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

Ivan Katchanovski

Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine:
http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

Ivan Katchanovski - a falsifier of the contemporary history of Ukraine
https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

Ivan Katchanovski produced pseudo-scientific paper named "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine" which is based on the deliberate falsifications of the Maidan events. Everyone who closely scrutinizes his paper sources and other videos about the Maidan in Ukraine will come to conclusions that the Ivan Katchanovski's paper The “Snipers’ Massacre”   on the Maidan" is a total falsification.  Particularly, Ivan Katchanovski on purpose ignores the overwhelming majority of shootings on many videos where people were killed from  the direction of the police "Berkut" barricade on Instituska street in Kiev. If everyone closely examine Ivan Katchanovski's source videos which he utilized in his paper named "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the  Maidan in  Ukraine", everyone will notice many shootings into Maidan protesters from the direction of police on Institutska street in Kiev.

There are  can not be downplayed or discounted the few episodes on videos where a few bullets might be shot at the back of protesters. However, it is very hard to judge without forensic investigations that these shootings were actually made from the behind of protesters.

The Ivan Katchanovski's sources and videos used in his fake paper named "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine" does NOT corroborate his conclusions in his  false research that Maidan protesters were shot from the locations controlled by Maidan forces.

To support his claim that Maidan protesters were shot at their backs, Ivan Katchanovski refers to the video episode showing a bullet hit a tree as  the proof that this bullet was fired from the hotel under control of protesters. In realty, this bullet was fired from  the opposite direction -- the direction of the police barricade on Institutska street.  Videos show  the moment when bullet exited  from the opposite side of the tree. The small fountain on  the tree from hitting bullet on the video  indicates that this video  episode demonstrates the leaving bullet from the opposite side of the tree.


On this video ( 60 Ibid; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DxkDiAcSF8 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZKrUYCPxg ))    Berkut police fire bullets from the location of the  Berkut police barricade at the advancing up Maidan protesters. One bullet hit  through the trunk of tree and came out from the side of the tree facing camera and the Hotel of “Ukraine” (00:18 and 2:42 minutes)
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/slavw_posts/67622866/44854/44854_900.jpg
The direction of bullet is indicated by the red arrow on the picture:
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/slavw_posts/67622866/44411/44411_900.jpg
In addition, this video ( 60 Ibid; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DxkDiAcSF8 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZKrUYCPxg )) demonstrates  falling back protesters being struck by bullets that were fired by Berkut police from
the Berkut police barricade next to the blue building by the address: #7 Institutska street:
( 35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs_4skLIqns , see 30:42 minute )
( 56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2zZiZhajzw  , see 00:05 minute )
( 48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsE7lYVa5kk , see 20:00 and 25:02—25:25 minutes )
The above videos were used by Ivan Katchanovski in his fake research.

These videos prove the fact that bullets were fired from the police barricade at the protesters alongside the Institutska street:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=70&v=7WcAts_UXLY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=192&v=goQSLzlV2Y8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAMgCOR-ps8 ( bullet holes on poles, trees and stones alongside Institutska street )
56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2zZiZhajzw
( holes from bullets on shield are seen on 6:30 – 7:20 minutes )
35 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs_4skLIqns (holes from bullets on the shield and the hotel wall on 25:35—27:20 minutes )
The last two videos were utilized by Ivan Katchanovski in his fake study.

The mass murder of Maidan protesters by government police from the Berkut police barricade and other locations controled by government police and security forces is evidenced by the pattern of bullet holes on poles, trees, the stone flower box and  hotel walls that were created by bullets fired from the directions of government police and security. The spatial pattern of bullet holes and traces alongside Institutska street also proves the fact that Berkut police targeted and shot advancing Maidan protesters, not fired warning shots, since the  spatial pattern of bullet holes and traces coincides with  positions of Maidan protesters on many photos and videos. Had any Katchanovski's mysterious “Maidan snipers” shot at protesters (how Ivan Katchanovski falsely claims in his fake research),  these shots would have created many bullet holes and traces from the directions of Maidan controlled locations alongside the Institutska street on an overwhelming majority photos and videos.  However, there are no bullet holes and traces on numerous pictures and videos from the directions of Maidan controlled locations. Aforesaid circumstances  proof the fact of the mass murder of Maidan protesters by Berkut police from the directions of police locations. As was many times reiterated, Maidan protesters seized a few firearms from  local police and security facilities, and used them only against Berkut police, not other friendly Maidan protesters.

According to the narrative on  34 , 37, 38  - 45 , 52  pages of Katchanovski’s research, many shots were fired from the roof of the Bank Arkada. However, Ivan Katchanovski did not explain how his “Maidan snipers” broke through the armed security of the Bank Arkada. Ivan Katchanovski pretends as though he is unaware about the existence of an armed security of the Bank Arkada, and the fact that every bank employs an armed security to guard bank money and valuables against potential armed bank robbers. Had Katchanovski's mysterious "Maidan snipers" attempted to enter the Bank Arkada building, they would have encountered armed resistance of the Bank Arkada security. However, there are no available  evidences of any attempts to fight or compromise the Bank Arkada security by Maidan protesters. Under the Ukrainian legal system, only the government police and security has legal right to enter any privately guarded premises and locations, including banks, and the guardians ( private security ) of such premises and locations must yield to lawful demand of the government police and security. Therefore, only government snipers had real chance to enter the guarded Bank Arkada and shoot at Maidan protesters. In addition, the entrance of the Bank Arkada is located on the Olhyns'ka  street which,  according to the map on the 18-th page of  Katchanovski’s "research"
( http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/25082/25082_900.jpg ) , was  under control of the Berkut police.  Also, Ivan Katchanovski circled on the map by the purple line the area  controlled by Maidan protesters, including   the part  of the Bank Arkada , the adjacent buildings on the Horodestsky Street and Hrushevsky Street. However, Katchanovski does not provide any proofs that this area was under control of the Maidan. Actually, this territory was rather under control of the government police and security as this territory contains roads and other approaches leading to the positions of Berkut police, government security, and government buildings. Therefore, only government snipers could shot at protesters from this area, not any Katchanovski's mysterious "Maidan snipers" how he falsely states in his pseudo-scientific research.   
According to numerous photos, videos, and publications, the actual maidan controlled territory was much smaller than the maidan territory outlined by Katchanovski on his map by the purple line
, and the Bank Arkada was under control of the government police and security forces.         ( To be continued  )
       

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:
                                                  ( To be continued  )          

Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/
                                      ( To be continued  )                                                                      

Іван Качановський ( Ivan Katchanovski ) - обличчя хруня або фальсифікації розстрілу "Небесної сотні"

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxx5W--cymI

Щоб побачити, як справді виглядає типовий хрунь, треба час від часу перечитувати дописи в інтернеті такого собі канадського "дослідника" українського походження Івана Качановського ( Ivan Katchanovski )  . Він не пропускає нагоди, щоб майже кожний раз, коли є відповідна ситуація в Українській державі та українському суспільстві, плюнути на   українських патріотів та на українську владу:
https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski
Серед його маразматичної писанини найбільшу увагу заслуговує "наукова праця", в якій він послуговуючись фальсифікаціями, намагається "доказати", що не снайпери "Беркуту" та СБУ стріляли та вбивали прихильників Майдану, а наче якісь  снайпери зі сторони Майдану самі розстрілювали майданівців і, мовляв, такий розстріл своїх був вигідний прихильникам Майдану, щоб скинути демократично вибрану владу януковича:
The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine
https://www.academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxx5W--cymI

Мені важко зрозуміти, чому Канада притягує різних хрунів на зразок "істориків" Віктора Поліщука, Івана-Павла Химку (Гимку) та тепер - "політолога"  Івана Качановського, які, вдаючись до недобросовісної та вигідної селекції фактів, тенденційних пояснень разом з фальсифікаціями, шкодять Україні та українцям.

Якимось дивним чином Іван Качановський не помічає на відео, які він використав у своїй "науковій праці", численні випадки стрільби та попадання в майданівців зі сторони снайперів "Беркуту", в напрямку яких  по Інститутській вулиці  йшли неозброєнні прихильники Євромайдану.  Натомість послуговується плітками та своїми суб'єктивними та тенденційними судженнями в оцінках подій на відео. Численні випадки подадання в прихильників майдану спереду з напрямку Беркуту та численні сліди від куль, які вказують, що їх було випущено зі сторони силовиків, можна побачити на багатьох відео. Наприклад:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qSvj8F_Br4M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqxWQa8Hl50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAMgCOR-ps8
І навіть ці попадання спереду в майданівців з позиції "Беркута" можна побачити на відео, які Іван Качановський використовує в якості джерел для свого "наукового дослідження":
https://www.academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine


Очевидно, що російські ЗМІ не могли не використати "наукову працю" Івана Качановського, яка характеризується вигідною селективністю фактів, замовчуванням невигідних фактів, тенденційною їх  інтерпретацією разом з потрібними  фальсифікаціями:
Иван Качановский. «Резня на Майдане»: дело о киевских снайперах | IGCP
Иван Качановский: за убийство более 100 человек на киевском Майдане 20 февраля ответственен сам Майдан | OSTKRAFT
Канадская версия: «Небесную сотню» расстреляли сторонники Майдана


Ivan Katchanovski чомусь до уваги не бере численні факти на відео, коли в наступаючих по Інститутській вулиці прихильників Євромайдану снайпери попадали з фронту і прихильники  Євромайдану падали і котилися назад. Розповіді людей про наче попадання куль в бік чи в спину прихильників Євромайдану  - не можуть бути надійними доказами, оскільки такі попадання
могли відбутися в момент, коли люди були повернуті до снайперів Беркуту на вулиці Інституській боком або спиною. Епізоди з численних відео не дають підстав  однозначно стверджувати,  що майданівцям стріляли в спину, чи в бік. Без відповідних експертиз неможливо стверджувати, що в майданівців стріляли з боку чи майданівцям стріляли в спину. Постріл в дерево на відео насправді був зроблений зі сторони снайперів "Беркуту", а не з готелю, і на відео зображено не попадання кулі в  дерево, а виліт кулі з дерева, яка попала в дерево зі сторони стрільби  снайперів міліції та СБУ.  Ivan Katchanovski не бере до уваги,  що записані радіопереговори працівників "Беркуту" та СБУ не можуть бути підтвердженням того,  що команда розстрілювати прихильників   Євромайдану НЕ могла бути виданою в останній  момент перед їх  розстрілом та НЕ всі переговори силовиків могли бути перехоплені та повністю записані. Дуже ймовірно, НЕ всі радіопереговори  були перехоплені та записані та (або) команда розстрілювати євромайданівців поступила майже перед самим початком розстрілів на вулиці Інститутській. Прихильники Євромайдану ніколи не  заперечували, що в них була якась невелика кількість зброї, але це не означає, що майданівці стріляли один в одного, як це намагається сфальсифікувати Іван Кочановський та інші подібні
йому фальсифікатори.

Але Іван Кочановський не є оригінальним у своєму "науковому дослідженні" - вже через два тижні після розстрілів на Євромайдані в інтернет було викинуто відео
"викриття" української версії рострілів прихильників Євромайдану:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8
(копія: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAgVXaMMu4g )
, на якому автор цього відео намагався так само, як Іван Кочановський "доказати", що прихильники Майдану "стріляли один в одного". Тим не менше,
автор цього викриття ( попри недобросовісне  та вигідне для власної версії подій вибирання та пояснювання фактів разом з фальсифікаціями ) є дещо чеснішим та поряднішим від
Івана Кочановського, і він стверджує, що снайпери також стріляли  ( див. відео https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLxSlq_hJu8 на 6:51 та 10:12 хвилинах ) з будинку під номером 4  на картинці з відео ( позначений номером чотири на відео ) за адресою: Київ. Інститутська 7, але  ЦЕЙ СИНІЙ БУДИНОК НАСПРАВДІ ЗНАХОДИВСЯ  В ТИЛУ "БЕРКУТУ", і на ньому аж ніяк не   могли бути  якісь "свої снайпери з Майдану".  Сайпер, який  на будинку ( позначений номером чотири на відео )  ( див. відео на  10:12 хвилині), насправді мав би бути на малюнку відео як такий, що розвернутий в протилежну сторону -- в сторону  наступу прихильників Євромайдану.   Кожен може на численних відео побачити, де знаходились прихильники Євромайдану, снайпери  "Беркуту" та цей синій будинок за адресою Інститутська 7. Також кожен може зробити  віртуальний тур між частиною вулиці Інститутської, де найбільше розстрілювали майданівців, та до синього  будинку за адресою Інститутська 7, який  знаходився біля базування снайперів  "Беркуту" і в тилу позиції "Беркуту", який,  як видно з численних відео, стріляв в прихильників Майдану:

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448433,30.528272,3a,75y,206.39h,85t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s_uYAVNU3L-I74JTEd7UecA!2e0
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.448349,30.528356,3a,75y,213.57h,76.95t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1ssUa4bioYZpya1HXArhRBBQ!2e0
......  .....
.....   .....

                                                                                                                                         
Наступні дописи щодо фальсифікацій Івана Качановского:

https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/
                 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            (  ДАЛІ   БУДЕ )


http://russian-aggression.blogspot.com/2015/03/ivan-katchanovski.html
Myslitel

Украинские националисты готовили покушение на Рузвельта по заданию немецких спецслужб

http://varjag-2007.livejournal.com/224760.html#cutid1

Украинские националисты готовили покушение на Рузвельта по заданию немецких спецслужб

В современной Украине из Степана Бандеры и его организации делают героев, хотя на самом деле они были международными террористами, пишет Иван Качановский, пост-докторский сотрудник факультета политологии Торонтского университета, в своей колонке для журнала Корреспондент.Когда историю забывают – это плохо, но еще хуже – когда ее перекручивают. Яркий тому пример – то, во что в современной Украине превращают Организацию украинских националистов (ОУН) и ее лидера Степана Бандеру.

Работая в архиве президента США Франклина Рузвельта [глава государства в 1933-1945 годы] над книгой о массовом советском  терроре в Украине в 1930-х годах, я натолкнулся на собранные американскими спецслужбами материалы об украинских террористах. Я и представить себе не мог, что теперь они станут героями популярной телепрограммы о Великих украинцах. А один из них и вовсе — фаворитом в гонке за звание величайшего из украинцев.

Collapse )

    Striking revelation about Ivan Katchanovski’s falsifications

    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    Ivan Katchanovski continues to lie, misrepresent, and falsify evidences of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine. For example, he insists that a bullet hit the tree from a direction of the Hotel Ukraina, referring to incorrect testimonies of the Belgian reporter and Ukrainian deputy


    ( https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1257445174285366


    http://archive.is/MQJEq


    https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/1222181027811781


    http://archive.is/HbSa7 )




    who are not forensic experts and who never examine the entrance and exit bullet holes on the tree from a close distance. Unfortunately for this Katchanovski falsification, there are many photographs shot from various directions and angles which vividly show the entrance and exit bullet holes on this tree , including the pictures of the entrance bullet hole which determinedly indicate that bullet was fired from the Berkut police barricade. For example:





    http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/1472/1472_original.jpg


    http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/22878/22878_original.jpg


    http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/19098/19098_original.jpg


    http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/26452/26452_original.jpg


    Also, there is the gallery of the other photos of the entrance and exit bullet holes on this tree with the internet sources of these pictures:


    http://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/734.html


    According to these photos, a bullet fired from a direction of the Berkut police barricade and from a shallow angle created the small entrance bullet hole and big exit bullet hole on this tree. In addition, this video https://ok.ru/video/11099769456 from 4:00 minutes clearly explains how a bullet fired from the Berkut police barricade made the entrance and exit bullet holes on this tree.


    Does Ivan Katchanovski know about these photos? Yes, of course!!! He was aware about these pictures since he utilized the photos source websites in his bogus research for other purposes. Ivan Katchanovski should have presented these photos in his paper, indicating the bullet direction from the Berkut police barricade. He must have told the truth that bullet hit this tree from a direction of the Berkut police barricade. Instead, Ivan Katchanovski blatantly lied to his readers and to his fellow scientists that a bullet was fired from a direction of the Hotel Ukraina. To uphold this falsification, he cited the erroneous non-expert testimonies of the Belgian journalist and Ukrainian deputy who are not forensic experts and who never examined the entrance and exit bullet holes on the tree from any close distance. Katchanovski also lied about an official investigation of GPU as though GPU concluded that a bullet hit the tree from a direction of the Hotel Ukraina. GPU never made such conclusion!
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

    (TO BE CONTINUED)

    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

    https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

    Twelve automatic rifles of the Berkut police unit were implicated in the Maidan Massacre, ....

    Twelve automatic rifles of the Berkut police unit were implicated in the Maidan Massacre, but this information was ignored and omitted in Ivan Katchanovski's "research".
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    From the moment of 1:20:50 of the court trial video on June 21, 2016 ( https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=4850 ). Prosecutor Psyuk pointed out that, according to the results of forensic examinations, at least twelve (12) automatic rifles, AKMS, of the Berkut police unit were involved in the Maidan massacre on February 20, 2014. Bullets were extracted from bodies of killed and wounded Maidan protesters, and forensic examinations proved that these bullets were shot from automatic rifles of the the Berkut police during Maidan events. He also said that maidan protester Maksym Shymko was killed from from the AKMS with the number of GU3557, and this AKMS was assigned to court tried Berkut police member Zinchenko. According to his words, bullets extracted from the bodies of maidan protesters of Kolesnikov, Kemskyy, Dziavulskyy, and Kovalchuk were shot from the AKMS with the number of 703087, and this AKMS was assigned to court tried Berkut police member Abroskin. Both Zinchenko and Arbroskin, the members of the Berkut police unit implicated in Maidan massacre, were present during court trial on June 21, 2016 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfHQLOp5PlE )

    Other prosecutor from the moment of 1:24:19 of court trial video https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=5059 states that forensic examinations proves that the Berkut police unit automatic rifles, AKMS, with the numbers of 493077, 517560, 599158, 600741, 864113, 866843, 513800, 493749, 511709, 864438 were involved in murders and wounding of Maidan protesters during Maidan massacre on February 20, 2014 year.

    From the moment of 1:03:10 of the court trial video of https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=3790 the judge starts reading the forensic investigation reports on bullets taken from the bodies of murdered maidan protesters and from the bodies of wounded maidan protesters during medical service. From the moment of 1:11:12 of the court trial video https://youtu.be/KfHQLOp5PlE?t=4271 , he pronounces the numbers ( 493077, 517560, 599158, 600741, 703877, 703087, 864113, 866843, 513800, 493749, 551709, 864438, 813913, GU3557 ) of AKMS of members of the Berkut police unit involved in the shootings during Maidan massacre.

    There are many internet publications on shootings of Maidan protesters by the Berkut police unit from the concrete barricade. They were automatically approximately translated and archived. For example:

    «Examination confirmed the participation of the Berkutovets in the killings on the Maidan - GPU»
    http://archive.fo/ujKWH (scroll down to read the full page)

    «Examination confirmed participation of berkutovtsy in murders on the Maidan, - GPU»
    http://archive.fo/f2Zkr (scroll down to read the full page)

    «GPU: From the official weapons of the Berkutovtsy Abroskin and Zinchenko killed three maydanovtsev»
    http://archive.is/qRLQr (scroll down to read the full page)

    There is a collection of translated and archived Ukrainian news websites about the involvement of the Berkut police in the Maidan massacre:
    https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/8414.html

    Ivan Katchanovski on purpose ignored and omitted this information about shootings of maidan protesters by Bercut police unit in his papers despite he used this court trial video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfHQLOp5PlE ) on page 31 of his “research paper” titled “The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government Investigations” to claim that one forensic examination based on “IBIS-TAIS system” proves that government police was not involved in the shootings of maidan protesters.
    https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/8586.html
    However, there are two internet publications explaining deficiencies of this forensic examination:
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

    http://archive.is/Zxkkj

    http://archive.is/t8iBt


                                    (To be continued)

    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

    (TO BE CONTINUED)

    The maidan protesters of Pankiv, Baidovsky, and other were killed by the Berkut police

    The maidan protesters of Pankiv, Baidovsky, Dziavulsky, and Varenytsia were killed by the Berkut police unit, but this information was ignored and omitted by Ivan Katchanovski
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/


    Like the court trial video from June 30, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k provides strong evidences on the involvement of the Berkut police unit in the murder of seven maidan protesters http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-maidan-protesters-of-dmytriv.html , the court trial video from July 5, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL5zSVAB5FM provides strong evidences that the maidan protesters of Pankiv, Baydovskyy, Dzyavulskyy, Varenytsya were also killed by the Berkut police unit.  Bullets were found and removed from the bodies of Pankiv, Baidovsky, Dziavulsky, and Varenytsia, and forensic examinations of these bullets prove that these protesters were murdered by the Berkut police unit during the Maidan massacre on Febuary 20, 2014 year.

    From the court video moment of 5 minutes and 50 second (5:50) of  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=348 , the judge begins reading the forensic examination report on the bullet removed from the body of Pankiv .  The prosecutor on 10:52 of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=652 stated that the bullet from the Pankiv's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AKMS rifle with number 600741 that belonged to the Berkut police member  who is currently at large and being wanted by the Ukrainian authorities.

    From the moment of 1:04:43 of the court trial video of  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1194 , the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on bullet taken from the body of Baidovsky. The prosecutor on 26:30
    of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1590 noted that the bullet taken out of the Baidovsky's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AK rifle numbered by 517560 of the Berkut police member who currently being at large and wanted. Defense attorney Varfolomeyev stated https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1630 that evidences of the previous  forensic examination report from 12.16  supports the evidences of this forensic examination that Baidovsky, Saienko and Ikiv were wounded from the same piece  of the weapon.

    From the moment of 32:20 of the court trial video https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=1926 , the judge begins reading the forensic investigation reports on the two bullets removed from the body of Dziavulsky. The prosecutor on 40:30 of https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2429 said that one bullet taken out of the Dziavulsky's body was identified as the bullet that was shot from the AKMS rifle with number 703087 which was assigned to court tried Berkut police member Abroskin. The forensic examination proves that the second bullet was fired from the AKMS rifle with number 513800 of Sadovnik, the commander of Berkut police unit, who fled to Russia. The second prosecutor emphasized https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2490 that two bullets found in the Dziavulsky's body were shot by Sadovnik and court tried Abroskin, the member of the same Berkut police unit, and they acted in a coherent manner in one police unit during the Maidan massacre on February 20, 2014 year.

    From the moment of 47:30 of the court trial video https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=2850 the judge begins reading the forensic investigation reports on the bullet extracted from the Varenytsia's body. The prosecutor on
    50:57  https://youtu.be/RL5zSVAB5FM?t=3057 noted that the bullet extracted from the Varenytsia's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AK rifle with the number of 866843, and this AK rifle was used by a Berkut police member who currently being wanted.

    All these above described and important but inconvenient for Katchanovski "research" evidences were omitted and ignored by Ivan Katchanovski despite he used this court trial video from July 5, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL5zSVAB5FM in his "research paper" named The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government Investigations on page 28 https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/50218/original.jpg in the sentence: "Four other of these protesters (Panteleev, Shymko, Solchanyk, and Tarasiuk) were shot either by military grade bullets or by expanding hunting bullets of the same caliber"
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/                                
    (To be continued)

    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

    (TO BE CONTINUED)




    The maidan protesters were killed by the Berkut police unit

    The maidan protesters of Dmytriv, Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky, Poliansky, Saienko, Smolensky were killed by the Berkut police unit, but this information was ignored and omitted by Ivan Katchanovski
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    The court video from June 30, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k
    provides solid evidences that the maidan protesters of Dmytriv, Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky, Poliansky, Saienko, Smolensky were killed by the members of the Berkut police unit from the Berkut police concrete barricade.  Bullets were found and extracted from the bodies of Dmytriv, Zhalovaha, Ilkiv, Kemsky, Poliansky, Saienko, Smolensky, and forensic investigations prove that these protesters were murdered by the Berkut police unit during the Maidan massacre on Febuary 20, 2014 year.

    From the court video moment of 49 minutes and 10 second 49:10 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=2950 and  49:44 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=2984 , the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Dmytriv. The prosecutor on 56:18 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=3348 emphasized that the bullet from Dmytriv's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AK rifle of Berkut police member Semysyuk.

    From the court video moment of 1:04:43 of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=3882 , the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Zhalovaha. The prosecutor on 1:08:51 of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4131 said that the bullet taken out of the Zhalovaha's body was identified as the bullet that was shot from the AK rifle numbered 864113 of one Berkut police member.

    From 1:12:40 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4320 the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Ilkiv. The prosecutor on 1:15:34  https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4532   noted that the bullet taken out of Ilkiv's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AKMS rifle with the number of 517560, and this AKMS rifle was assigned to Berkut police member Devyatko who currently being at large and wanted by Ukrainian authorities. Also, the prosecutor said that the bullet removed from the Ilkiv's body is identical with the bullets extracted from the bodies of Saienko and Baidovsky.

    From 1:20:25 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=4825 the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Kemsky. The prosecutor on 1:25:16 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=5086  said that the bullet removed from the Kemsky's body was identified as the bullet that was shot from the AKMS rifle numbered by 703087 of court tried Berkut police member Abroskin . Abroskin was present on this court session on June 30, 2016.

    From 1:38:51 of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=5931 the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Poliansky. The prosecutor on 1:41:45 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=6100 noted that the bullet taken out of the Polyansky's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AK rifle with number 513800, and this AK rifle was used by commander Sadovnyk of the Berkut police unit during the Maidan massacre on Febuary 20, 2014 year. The attorney of the tried Berkut police members on 1:42:11 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=6131 noted that from this AK weapon were wounded eight other Maidan protesters.

    From the court video moment of 2:32:40 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9160 , the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Sayenko. The prosecutor on 2:37:30 of https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9434 said that the bullet taken out of the Sayenko's body was identified as the bullet that was shot from the AK rifle with number 517560, and this AK rifle was assigned to Berkut police member who is at large and wanted by Ukrainian authorities.

    From the court video moment of 2:43:15 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9795 the judge starts reading the forensic investigation report on the bullet removed from the body of Smolensky. The prosecutor on the video moment of 2:46:20 https://youtu.be/1iFGip3tB3k?t=9975 said that the bullet extracted from the Smolyanskyy's body was identified as the bullet that was fired from the AKMS rifle of a Berkut police member.

    All these evidences were omitted and ignored in the Katchanovski research though Ivan Katchanovski used five times this court trial video from June 30, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iFGip3tB3k in his research paper named The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government Investigations: https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/7109.html

    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/


    (To be continued)
    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/

    (TO BE CONTINUED)

    Ivan Katchanovski falsified the murder of Anatoliy Zhalovaha

    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    Ivan Katchanovski on pages 45 and 46 of his “research” paper of "The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government Investigations" states that the photo of Anatoliy Zhalovaha helmet shows an entry bullet hole in the right back area of the helmet.

    https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/6722.html
    Actually, this photo http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/51,114871,15935825.html?i=0 shows bullet hole at the middle of the helmet forehead. If anyone closely scrutinizes and compares the enlarged Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet on the photo with example helmets, he or she would see the front of the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet with bullet hole at the middle of the forehead. There are areas circled and numbered by “1, 2, 3, 4 , 5” on the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet and example helmets:

    https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/6327.html

    The area with the distinctive snakelike helmet rim curvature close to the helmet front and circled by blue and red circles and marked by blue “5” number and red “2” number on the helmet pictures indicates the front part of the Anatoliy Zhalovaha helmet on the photo:

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/42737/42737_900.jpg

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/46070/46070_900.jpg

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/rassian_fakes/78051020/40730/40730_900.jpg

    Ivan Katchanovski failed to explain how this allegedly entry bullet hole is located at the middle of the forehead on the photo if it entered, according to the Katchanovski “research”, behind the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s right ear.  Had this bullet hole was the entry bullet hole behind the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s right ear, it would have been located somewhere near right bottom of the helmet at the spot circled by blue and red circles and marked by blue “5” number and red “2” on the helmet pictures, not at the middle top part of the helmet.

    Moreover, the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father in his testimony during court trial told that this photo contains the front of the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet with the bullet hole in the middle of the forehead. The Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father pointed out that the bullet hole is concave, bulging inside the helmet, and it means that Anatoliy Zhalovaha was hit at the middle of his forehead ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=16053  4:27:33 – 4:29:20 ). According to the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father testimony, there was a small entry bullet hole at the Anatoliy Zhalovaha forehead and a big exit hole at the back of Anatoliy Zhalovaha head. ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18875 , 5:14:35 – 5:15:20 ) Neither attorneys of five tried Berkut police members, no Berkut police members objected or questioned the Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s father testimony that this photo shows the front part of Anatoliy Zhalovaha’s helmet with the bullet hole at the middle of the forehead. But Ivan Katchanovski omitted this very important but inconvenient for his “research” testimony though he used this court trial video in his paper.

    Ivan Katchanovski also omitted testimonies of prosecutors and a defense attorney. According to their testimonies, bullet that killed Anatoliy Zhalovaha was found, and a forensic investigation determined that this bullet was shot from the AK rifle of a Berkut police member who now is at large and wanted by Ukrainian authorities: ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18172 5:02:52 – 5:04:40 ) The defense attorney Varfolomeyev of tried Berkut police members said that from this weapon of the Bercut police member were shot ten maidan protesters, including Anatoliy Zhalovaha ( https://youtu.be/4n0BFF8ZLxg?t=18377 5:06:18 – 5:08:06 , 5:07:10 ) But Ivan Katchanovski on pages 34, 35 of his research falsely states that these ten maidan protesters ( Kemsky, Korneev, Saienko, Zhalovaha, Shymko, Dmytriv, Ilkiv, Poliansky, and Smolensky ) were shot from the Hotel Ukraina.
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    (To be continued)

    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/
    (TO BE CONTINUED)

    Ivan Katchanovski fake invention on shootings of maidan protesters by "maidan snipers" from.....

    Ivan Katchanovski fake invention on shootings of maidan protesters by "maidan snipers" from the Bank Arkada the Museum Lane or an Ivan Katchanovski's attempt to whitewash fled corrupted president Viktor Yanukovich and his criminal, kleptocratic government
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    Ivan Katchanovski  in his “research”  publications and video appendices falsely claims that many maidan protesters were shot by  the "maidan snipers" from the direction of the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane even though these locations were under control of the government police and security forces during the Maidan massacre and there are no any available evidences that Maidan protesters approached even close to these locations during the Maidan massacre.

    There are no any publically available videos and any other evidences that the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane were under control by the Katchanovski’s mysterious “maidan snipers” ( The “maidan snipers” were earlier invented by Russian propaganda and supported later by Katchanovski himself in his "study" on the Maidan massacre). Neither Ivan Katchanovski provided any these evidences in his papers and video appendices on the Maidan massacre in Ukraine. Only Ivan Katchanovski in his “study” of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine falsely  claims that the Bank Arkada like the Museum Lane were under control by the misterious “maidan snipers” during the Maidan Massacre. In fact, as it was proved in the previous posts ( http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/2015/05/ivan-katchanovski-falsifier-of.html ), the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane were controlled by the government police and security forces during the Maidan Massacre.  Ivan Katchanovski solely invented this “defence” for the Berkut government police for the purpose to whitewash corrupted president Viktor Yanukovych and his criminal government.

    Even during the court trial  of  five Berkut policemen located on the  Berkut police concrete barricade the same issue that the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane were controlled by “maidan snipers”  was never introduced by any parts of the court trial despite  five court tried Berkut policemen and their defense attorneys used  shootings from the adjacent buildings located near the Berkut police concrete barricade as a defense that these shots from the adjacent buildings have nothing to do with criminal charges of  five Berkut policemen during the court trial. To defend in court five members of Berkut police unit, their defense attorneys claim that other government security force units like Omega and Alfa shot maidan protesters from the adjacent buildings and why five court tried Berkut police members who were on the concrete barricade during the massacre are not responsible for these shots. Ivan Katchanovski did not mentioned about these inconvenient evidences ( like he omitted and ignored other inconvenient evidences on shootings of maidan  protesters by government police and security ) in his "research" publications and videos.

    This issue how Ivan Katchanovski attributes killing and wounding of maidan protesters from the Bank Arkada and the Museum Lane to the mysterious “maidan snipers” demonstrates the Ivan Katchanovski attempt to whitewash fled corrupted president Viktor Yanukovich and his criminal, kleptocratic government.  (To be continued)
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

    Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:  https://www.facebook.com/Ivan-Katchanovski-is-a-falsifier-of-the-contemporary-history-of-Ukraine-1449195048708622/
    (TO BE CONTINUED)

    Vasyl Halamai was shot by the Berkut police

    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    Ivan Katchanovski on  page 52 https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/4747.html of his “research” titled Snipers Massacre on the Maidan in Ukraine claims that Vasyl Halamai was wounded from the direction of the Bank Arkada though the Bank Arkada was under control of the government police and security forces during massacre.  On page 62 https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/5051.html of  the next paper named The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Government Investigations  Ivan Katchanovski   used the court trial video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBd3OypMDw as the source to inform that a Maidan protester aimed a hunting rifle at the direction of Berkut police member Symysiuk. But neither in his papers nor in his facebook posts Ivan Katchanovski mentioned that almost entire court trial video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBd3OypMDw tells that Vasyl Hamalai was wounded during Maidan Massacre from the direction of the Berkut police barricade and a bullet was shot from the rifle of a Berkut policeman who fled to Russia.  Also, there are internet resources that Vasyl Halamay was shot by one of Berkut Police members.  For example:

    The google translation and the archived copies of the google translation of this page:

    <<The investigation established which machine was fired from the bullet and even found out to whom this weapon was issued. However, it is still unknown who made the shot.

    Prosecutor Roman Psyuk noted: "The bullet that was extracted from the victim's body is 7.62. This bullet is identified as such, which was released from the machine of one of the fighters of "Berkut", which is wanted for this time. They were all wearing masks, only a few people identified. ">>
    There are many other news reports on how Vasyl Halamai was shot by one of the Berkut policeman who fled to Russia: https://rassian-fakes.livejournal.com/4445.html

    This issue with Vasyl Halamai in Katchanovski “research” demonstrates how Katchanovski unscientifically and unscrupulously deals with sources in his “research” on the Maidan Masacre in Ukraine since he used the small episode in the court trial video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJBd3OypMDw lasting less than minute about the killing of police member Symysiuk while he omitted  more than three hours main story of the video about wounding Vasyl Halamai by police on which he dwelt in his previous paper. This case shows how, in addition to outright falsifications, manipulations, and distortions, Ivan Katchanovsky in his “study” silences, suppresses, and stonewalls evidences on shootings of Maidan protesters  by government police and security forces.
    (To be continued)
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/

      Further updates on Ivan Katchanovski's falsifications:

    Problems with Katchanovski “witness testimonies” in his Video Appendix B

    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    The absolute majority of Katchanovski "witnesses" of snipers in his Video Appendix B
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU0jxKJ4LaY are not witnesses by definition since witnesses by definition are people who directly and immediately saw and heard witnessed events. During Maidan events, people used to retell other people stories and rumors which Katchanovski misrepresented them as original witness accounts in this Video Appendix B: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU0jxKJ4LaY . Katchanovski must look up the definition of words “witness testimony”, and, to be honest researcher, he must give an advance notice in his Video Appendix B that the retold stories and rumors of other people actually are not witness testimonies.

    One of the big problems with Ivan Katchanovski “research” is the intentional omitting and ignoring of opposite evidences and testimonies about bullets fired from the area controlled by government police and security forces. For example, Katchanovski refers to Trapezun testimony during an investigative experiment on 7:15 minutes of his Video Appendix B. However, Trapezun in the court changed his opinion about the bullet direction. Starting on 1:07 minutes of court video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI2eS5Xfwt0 , he explained that he initially imagined the Maidan protesters were fired from the Hotel Ukraina, and he later became sure about killing Maidan protesters from the police barricade after the performance of the investigative experiment. Trapezun said he did not see a moment of firing and he only initially imagined the bullet direction from the Hotel Ukraina. After the investigative experiment he changed his opinion. Katchanovski dishonestly omitted this critical episode from his “research” and Video Appendix B.

    During the Maidan masacre, people looking at direction of the police front line, heard reflected gunshot sounds from the Hotel Ukraina and other buildings located in the Maidan area that why these gunshot sound reflections from buildings walls made the impression of gunshots fired from the Hotel Ukraina and  other buildings under Maidan control : https://archive.is/wrPqw#selection-1281.0-1281.278
    Many spoken stories of Katchanovski Video Appendix B refer to shootings from the Bank Arkada, Museum Lane, Cabmin and Kyivmiskbud. However, according to numerous publicly available videos and other evidences, Maidan protesters never approached these locations which were firmly under control of the government police and security forces during the Maidan massacre. Also, it must be noted that Cabmin and Kyivmiskbud were located deep in the rear of the front line of government police and security forces during the massacre.

    Ivan Katchanovski also mistranslated the spoken stories on his Video Appendix B. For example, on 21:15 minutes of Video Appendix B a policeman said that police saw people without weapons on building roofs and police only assumed that other people on building roofs have weapons. Ivan Katchanovski mistranslated this episode that people on building roofs have weapons. 
    ( To be continued )
    http://ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com/
    Posted by